In Britain, the relentless drive to promote “diversity” in all areas of society has taken its toll on its name. One of his is merit: Talent is rare and useful, so you should seek it out wherever you can find it.to make a priori Fetishes against women and ethnic minorities will inevitably interfere with what should be a thorough, evidence-based talent search process. But recent sacrifices are nothing less than Britain’s ability to survive as a nation.
Unfortunately, this power is weakening. Plus, it didn’t have to happen. The British military, which has a small role in defending its territory, has shrunk by 40% since 2010. Currently, there are only 70,000 enlisted soldiers.There is even Conscription story In case of war.
It may be a stretch to blame diversity alone for this failure, but our political class, especially the deplorable Conservative Party, must bear a significant share of the blame. Rather than simply allowing corruption to infect the top echelons of the military, successive Conservative governments have upheld Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI), the tripartite motto of racial communists around the world. He has actively ordered the military to adopt it.
It’s not just a cliché. Over the past decade, this has become a deliberate policy with very real consequences for those of us who love Britain as our only homeland. More or less everyone can say this about the politicians who most admire diversity, from London Mayor Sadiq Khan to the Prime Minister. Rishi SunakIt has shown no interest in increasing the number of white Britons on Tower Hamlets Council or in diversifying rap music to involve more of Northumbria’s pasty youth. As I have argued before, for the activists most attached to the rallying cry, the inevitable conclusion is that “diversity” is simply a euphemism for “less white.” Therefore, in the UK her DEI law: strengthened By the Conservative Party in 2017, Due to expansion plans According to Sir Keir Starmer, if he were to become Prime Minister it would effectively amount to legalized ethnic cleansing of the Founders and indigenous peoples.
No wonder so few people aspire to join the military. This is because the military is largely at the behest of the central government and, like other institutions, has been corrupted by anti-white racism.that Appeared Royal Air Force (RAF) squadron leader Andrew Harwin revealed last year that he had instructed his staff to stop selecting “useless white male pilots” for training courses in 2021. This was not an isolated scandal. In 2022, it became undeniable that the Royal Air Force actively discriminated against white men under the leadership of Sir Mike Wigston, who resigned, but new commander Richard Lord Knighton committed a self-defeating act. I apologized. He also admitted that the Royal Air Force’s own targets, set independently from the government, to have 40% women and 20% ethnic minorities by 2030 were unrealistic. Embarrassingly, Knighton failed to declare that such inherently anti-white quotas were also wrong in principle.
Undoubtedly, all Tory MPs see the Israeli Defense Forces commander as some kind of eccentric, perhaps a self-hating rebel, who supports “diversity” measures designed to make the Israeli army “gentile.” They might even consider you a Judaizer. Why does it make a difference when a country is the homeland of white Anglo-Celtic ancestry rather than Israeli-Jewish ancestry, as in the case of Britain? But the futile target of the Royal Air Force under Wigston Quite apart, the Ministry of Defense itself, led by a succession of Conservative ministers since 2010, has actively participated in the gradual ethnic cleansing of white Britons from the military.The department has spent the entire report So to speak, to repair The problem is that there are too many white men in the ranks.
The United States faces a similar crisis. Last year, the U.S. military fell 10,000 short of its enlistment goal of 65,000. This is primarily due to a decline in the number of white recruits from 44,000 in 2018 to 25,000 in 2023. Far from considering the folly of stigmatizing the nation’s core, the progressive left, the group primarily responsible for fighting the war, cheered.a Deputy article “Far-right Congressman Paul Gossard is losing sleep over how few white people are joining the military these days,” he quipped. Rather than a comment, he will let you talk with two completely different images.of beginning During the Battle of the Bulge (December 1944-January 1945), a small portion of the American soldiers repulsed Hitler’s final trench counterattack to capture the port of Antwerp, vital for supplying Allied forces on the Western Front. It shows.of Number 2 This is a photo of Deputy Staff Room.
Perhaps if he wins in November, Donald Trump will have the courage to correct this fatal flaw by completely banishing DEI from the US military and restoring a culture of meritocracy and nationhood. . As for the UK, Grant Shapps’ government will likely have a Conservative defense minister. reassure We believe that British women, not men, are the obvious solution to the recruitment crisis.
Of course, the meritocracy case against all this is formidable in itself. If diversity is number one among military values, quality should be a close second at best. In majority-white countries, the average man is more likely to have a career in the military than the average woman, so adopting a righteous bias in favor of women and minorities will inevitably lead to a decline in human resources. The pool will run dry. It’s stupid enough for a private company to do this, but it’s completely suicidal for a national military to play a game like this. Because during wartime, countries rely on human resources fighting to ensure their security, not on ideological quotas.
But while the benefits are important, there is also the larger, more controversial issue of identity. A first-rate military is based on more than force.Success in battle is not determined only by how you fight. good A man can fight, but what He’s willing to die for it. The world’s most feared soldier is not only worthless, but even harmful, if his loyalty is devoted to fighting for the enemy. The British Army should be a treasure trove of military talent and a place where young people can demonstrate their patriotism and sense of duty to their own people. In countries like the UK, that means focusing recruitment efforts on the unapologetically white majority. This is because young people in this group generally feel an instinctive sense of loyalty inherited from their ancestors. Patriam And that fate. This is a surer way of replenishing our country’s depleted ranks than doggedly preying on ethnic minorities, admirable as they may be, but whose roots here are shallow and whose ties to Britain are relatively weak.
Immigrant communities are more concerned with their tribal background (ethnic, religious, or both) than with their culture, as the social turmoil in European cities over conflicts thousands of miles away has become all too evident. It is human nature to have a tendency to passionately identify. the country they choose to live in; Do we seriously expect Ethiopians and Eritreans engaged in war? London street battle Just last month, was the fate of East Africa so swayed by politically correct military recruitment ads that it risked Britain’s death? Even if they overlook the violence, immigrants do not have to hate this country or even feel neutral about its future to carry on the idea of a military career. I don’t hate Israel. I am not indifferent to its prosperity either. But I would never be as eager to join the Israel Defense Forces as a young Jewish patriot born and raised in Jerusalem.
Leicester’s 2022 scene Moreover, many in the country’s ethnic and religious diaspora have indicated that they would rather wage war over a cricket match in the Indian subcontinent than resist an invasion at home. This is an indictment of decades of perfidious policy-making under both Labor and Conservative governments. Any Many people, as well as tribalistic foreigners, are allowed to live here as paper citizens. No doubt Jacob Rees-Mogg has a pious legalistic view of British citizenship, and calls British people as ‘fellow British’ as he is with a monocle and a Savile Row suit. It is regarded as myself when I was younger.
Some people vehemently disagree and accuse me of playing identity politics. If it’s any closer to the truth, it’s because neither vote is cast and mass The blame lies with left-wing progressives who have chosen to divide Britain through a demographic experiment. Or those fired by the British people themselves.On the other hand, in a mono-ethnic country, identity is precede In countries as diverse as Congo and now Britain, politics looks like this: about Identity. Thanks to the disastrous and borderline treason policy of replacement immigration, British-born people have been reduced from the core of the nation, where majority status is taken for granted, to just one local interest group among many. It has become an extremely unpopular and publicly maligned group.Just this week, a right-wing activist named Sam Melia was found guilty He was accused of inciting racial hatred at Leeds Crown Court. His crime? Advocating on behalf of white British people accused of being ‘racist’ sticker They held slogans such as “By 2066 we will be a minority in our homeland” and “Stop mass immigration.”
Unless fundamental changes occur to reverse this self-inflicted crisis, our national security will be further endangered. Until that happens, we will continue to live in a world-weary tree where young white men are relentlessly demonized as parasites and condemned to live as second-class citizens in the country their ancestors built for themselves. How convincingly can you feign surprise at the fact that you feel like a beard? Lord of the Ring? “I don’t completely agree with anyone.” ~ side” Tolkien’s otolaryngologist sighs. ~ side”
